Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent The Grove, Barston Lane, Barston, West Midlands, B92 0JP
Planning appeal 3343895 at Land Adjacent The Grove, Barston Lane, Barston, West Midlands, B92 0JP (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 March 2025 by Inspector Clowes M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies.
Construction of a detached two storey dwelling and ancillary site works
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Clowes M
- Postcode
- B92 0JP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for residential development having regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the impact on trees
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and character, with no very special circumstances to justify it, and the Green Belt protection provides a clear reason for refusal that displaces the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The modest benefit from creation of one new dwelling did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and the character and appearance of the area, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development was not engaged because Green Belt protection provided a clear reason for refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P17Policy P5Policy P7Policy P15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Solihull
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed23 October 20266013961The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
- Allowed23 October 20266009733Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
- Allowed12 August 20266010526The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
- Allowed17 July 20266005246Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
- Dismissed28 May 20266006096The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®