Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 January 20253344119

Richmond Court, 122 Richmond Park Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8TH

Planning appeal 3344119 at Richmond Court, 122 Richmond Park Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8TH (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was allowed on 16 January 2025 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on trees and vegetation.

erection of 3 x two storey, 2-bed dwellings with associated access, parking, bin and cycle storage, involving demolition of existing garages

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edwards J
Postcode
BH8 8TH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on trees and vegetation
  • whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants
  • the effect of the development and associated collection of waste on highway safety and traffic movement
  • its effect on the integrity of the protected sites

What decided it

The development would accord with the development plan when read as a whole, avoiding harm to character and appearance, providing acceptable living conditions, not prejudicing highway safety or waste collection, and securing appropriate mitigation for protected sites through the unilateral undertaking.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS21CS41CS33Policy 6.8Policy 8.1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

264 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266007836
    65a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
  2. Allowed28 September 20266007175
    281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266007187
    5 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
  4. Allowed4 September 20266011111
    18 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH
  5. Allowed4 September 20266003539
    Marina Court, 34 Banks Road, Poole, BH13 7QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.