Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20243344187

Trelawney, Jobs Lane, Cookham, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 9TX

alterations to an existing garage to include a new external staircase and raising of the eaves and ridge to create a new first floor

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Evans L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing site and of the local area
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, whether this would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt as a disproportionate addition to the original building, and the harm to the Green Belt is not outweighed by other material considerations.

Framework references: 154, 142, 13

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy Q3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.