Planning appeal decision
Tree Tops, Cottons Lane, Aston Underhill, Worcestershire, WR11 7SS
Planning appeal 3344260 at Tree Tops, Cottons Lane, Aston Underhill, Worcestershire, WR11 7SS (Wychavon District Council) was dismissed on 27 September 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area.
2 new self-build dwellings to include change of use to residential
- Authority
- Wychavon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
- Postcode
- WR11 7SS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development strategy for the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, giving special regard to the effect on the National Landscape
- the effect of the proposed development on designated heritage assets
- whether or not the parking and access arrangements would be acceptable
- whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility to services and facilities
What decided it
The substantial and harmful effect on the character and appearance of the Cotswolds National Landscape and the less than substantial harm to the setting of the Ashton under Hill Conservation Area, which provided a clear reason for refusal disengaging the tilted balance, outweighed the limited benefits of two additional dwellings.
The public benefits of two additional dwellings with associated social and economic benefits and environmental benefits from renewable energy and biodiversity enhancements, afforded moderate to limited weight, were outweighed by the substantial harm to the National Landscape and less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area setting, to which great weight must be given.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SWDP 1Policy SWDP 2Policy SWDP 4Policy SWDP 5Policy SWDP 6Policy SWDP 13Policy SWDP 15Policy SWDP 21Policy SWDP 22Policy SWDP 23Policy SWDP 24Policy SWDP 25Policy SWDP 26Policy CE5 of the Cotswolds National Landscape Management Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 63Paragraph 109Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 180Paragraph 182Paragraph 208Paragraph 212
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 June 20266007756Land West of Cockshot Lane (Os 9802 5620), Dormston, Kington, WR7 4LD
- Allowed11 March 20266001819Core Hill Farm, Blacksmiths Lane, Cropthorne, Worcestershire, WR10 3LX
- Split Decision24 February 202660033857 Besscaps, Elmley Castle, Pershore, Worcs, WR10 3HW
- Planning permission granted9 January 20263358435The Forge, 218 Droitwich Road, Fernhill Heath, Worcester, WR3 7UA
- Dismissed9 December 20253359134218 Droitwich Road, Fernhill Heath, Worcester, WR3 7UA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®