Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 February 20253344275

Hill View, Sapperton, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 6LE

Planning appeal 3344275 at Hill View, Sapperton, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 6LE (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 7 February 2025 by Inspector Kirby R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location of the appeal site and its relationship to designated heritage assets is suitable for residential development.

Permission in Principle application for the erection of 1no. infill dwelling at Hill View, Sapperton, Gloucestershire, GL7 6LE

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Kirby R
Postcode
GL7 6LE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location of the appeal site and its relationship to designated heritage assets is suitable for residential development

What decided it

The harm to the listed building Hill View and the Sapperton Conservation Area, individually less than substantial but cumulatively considerable, was not outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery, and the policies protecting designated heritage assets provided a strong reason for refusal under Framework paragraph 11(d).

the benefits of housing delivery in a sustainable settlement, whilst considerable, were not sufficient to outweigh the less than substantial but cumulatively considerable harm to the listed building and conservation area

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy EN10Policy EN11Policy DS3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 214Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

No other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cotswold

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010613
    Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
  2. Allowed13 October 20266007597
    Kilkeney Inn, Andoversford, Cheltenham, GL54 4LN
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266010770
    100 Gloucester Road, Cirencester, GL7 2LW
  4. Allowed30 September 20266009635
    Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266009631
    Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.