Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278

Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

Planning appeal 3344278 at Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE (Mid Suffolk District Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 1 September 2026 by Inspector King T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the alleged breach of planning control (change of use of land from agricultural use to residential use, involving the use of a cabin for occasional overnight stays) has occurred as a matter of fact.

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
Change of use
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the alleged breach of planning control (change of use of land from agricultural use to residential use, involving the use of a cabin for occasional overnight stays) has occurred as a matter of fact

What decided it

The cabin building lacks the facilities and characteristics required to constitute a dwellinghouse or self-contained residential unit, and therefore the alleged breach of planning control has not occurred as a matter of fact.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  2. Dismissed28 August 20263343778
    Bridge Field Paddock, Green Road, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3RA
  3. Dismissed16 March 20263356460
    Cagmans Farm, High Road, Great Finborough, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 3AP
  4. Notice upheld16 March 20263348273
    Cagmans Farm, High Road, Great Finborough, Suffolk, IP14 3AP
  5. Dismissed13 January 20263370693
    The Land at The Caravan Park, Mendlesham Road, Wetheringsett-cum-Brockford, Suffolk, IP14 5NU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.