Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 December 20243344507

132 Sandling Lane, Penenden Heath, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 2EG

the change of use of land to residential garden and extension of existing drive (retrospective)

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Walker R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the development on the irreplaceable habitat within the Sandling Wood Ancient Woodland
  • The character and appearance of the area with particular reference to the Sandling Wood Ancient Woodland

What decided it

The absence of substantive technical evidence demonstrating that the development would not harm the irreplaceable habitat of the Ancient Woodland, combined with the failure to demonstrate wholly exceptional reasons for such loss as required by NPPF paragraph 186.

Framework references: 186

Plan policies cited: LPRSP14(A), LPRSP15, LPRQD4, LPRSP9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.