Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20243344795

Royal Borough Of Kensington & Chelsea, Town Hall Hornton Street, LONDON, W8 7NX

the part change of use of basement car park to provide 985sqm of flexible work-space and ancillary welfare provision (Use Class E), 130sqm training facility (Use Class E) and 2,635sqm self-storage facility (Use Class B8); and ancillary uses including cycle parking with changing facilities and electrical car charging points

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Wyborn D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the scheme would demonstrate the highest standards of fire safety in accordance with the requirements of the development plan
  • whether or not the loss of the existing car parking spaces, and the related management of the car park, would result in unacceptable displacement of vehicles thereby leading to undue disturbance to nearby residential properties and unacceptably increase parking pressure in the area

What decided it

The scheme does not demonstrate that it would achieve the highest standards of fire safety in accordance with Policy CD16 of the Local Plan 2024 and Policy D12 of the London Plan 2021, specifically regarding the safety of electric vehicle charging points in the basement areas, which the Inspector determined required a precautionary approach given the confined nature of the underground space and the concerns raised by the Council's Building Control Team.

Plan policies cited: Policy CD16, Policy D12, Policy T8, Policy CD9, Policy T1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.