Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 November 20243344992

39a Dartmouth Road, London, SE23 3HN

Planning appeal 3344992 at 39a Dartmouth Road, London, SE23 3HN (London Borough of Lewisham) was dismissed on 13 November 2024 by Inspector Naylor R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: effect of the proposal on the living conditions of surrounding residents with specific regard to privacy, enclosure and outlook.

the demolition of garage, change of use, alteration and conversion of the ground floor and first floor and extension at roof level at the rear of 39 and 41 Dartmouth Road SE23 to provide a dwelling house with roof terrace, together with new courtyard and associated works

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Naylor R
Postcode
SE23 3HN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effect of the proposal on the living conditions of surrounding residents with specific regard to privacy, enclosure and outlook
  • effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with specific regard to daylight and sunlight
  • loss of any existing employment space

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the living conditions of both neighbouring residents and future occupiers, combined with insufficient evidence that the loss of employment space was justified, meant the proposal conflicted with development plan policies and the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DM32DM33Policy 15 (LCS)Policy D6 (LP)Policy 11 (LDMP)Policy 5 (LCS)Policy E2 (LP)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

390 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed23 October 20266013784
    58a Manor Park, Hither Green, London, SE13 5RL
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011958
    Plot to the Rear of 4 Wickham Road, Wickham Mews, London, SE4 1PS
  3. Allowed24 September 20266014022
    30 Horncastle Road, Lee, London, SE12 9LA
  4. Dismissed11 September 20266009541
    32, Bromley Road, London, SE6 2TP
  5. Allowed11 September 20266004929
    1 - 3A Doggett Road, London, SE6 4PZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.