Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 December 20243345414

Hill Bury, Halls Lane, Waltham St. Lawrence, READING, RG10 0JD

a single storey side extension with undercroft, replacement roof, raising of the ridge, 1no. front dormer, 1no. side dormer, 4 no rear dormers, relocation of front entrance with canopy, alterations to fenestration, extension of the existing patio, air source heat pumps, new front boundary treatment and hardstanding and enlargement of the existing access following the demolition of the existing elements

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Butcher C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal would conserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Waltham St. Lawrence Conservation Area
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt as a disproportionate extension, and additionally causes harm to the Conservation Area through boundary treatment changes that erode its character, with neither harm outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy HE1, Policy QP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.