Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 November 20243345429

67 Garrick Drive, Thamesmead, LONDON, SE28 0EQ

demolition of detached garage and erection of detached 2 bedroom 3 person house

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupants of the property, with particular regard to internal space provision

What decided it

The proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole due to significant harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, and these adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and poor living conditions for future occupants, afforded significant weight, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery and energy efficiency, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11, 60, 131, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy H(c), Policy DH1, Policy DH(a), Policy H5, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy 3.3

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.