Planning appeal decision
67 Garrick Drive, Thamesmead, London, SE28 0EQ
Planning appeal 3345429 at 67 Garrick Drive, Thamesmead, London, SE28 0EQ (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 12 November 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of detached garage and erection of detached 2 bedroom 3 person house
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
- Postcode
- SE28 0EQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupants of the property, with particular regard to internal space provision
What decided it
The proposal would conflict with the development plan as a whole due to significant harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, and these adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework.
The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and poor living conditions for future occupants, afforded significant weight, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery and energy efficiency, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H(c)Policy DH1Policy DH(a)Policy H5Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy 3.3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 131Paragraph 135
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed30 September 2026600747044 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
- Dismissed14 July 20263375007Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
- Unknown14 July 20263374853Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
- Dismissed6 July 202633767672-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
- Allowed19 June 20266000585278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®