Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 December 20243345512

Rose Bank, Burton End, Haverhill, Suffolk, CB9 9AD

Planning appeal 3345512 at Rose Bank, Burton End, Haverhill, Suffolk, CB9 9AD (West Suffolk) was dismissed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Naylor R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effects of the proposal on living conditions for future residents with regard to privacy, noise, anti-social behaviour; and provision of waste, recycling and cycle facilities.

Erection of 3 no. 1 bed bungalows with parking, visitor parking, landscaping, bin store, boundary treatments, a new section of public footpath & relocation of 1no. street light

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Naylor R
Postcode
CB9 9AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effects of the proposal on living conditions for future residents with regard to privacy, noise, anti-social behaviour; and provision of waste, recycling and cycle facilities
  • Character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would not provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers in respect of privacy, noise, and waste/recycling/cycle storage provision, conflicting with development plan policies DM2 and DM46 and the Framework.

The modest social and economic benefits of delivering three new units and promoting efficient use of underutilised land (moderate weight) were outweighed by the unacceptable living conditions for future residents regarding privacy, noise, and waste facilities.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DM2DM46DM22
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 191Paragraph 193Paragraph 135
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE and Another (1982) 43 P. & C.R. 233; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed7 July 20266007491
    Sparks Farm, Hurdle Drove, West Row, IP28 8RF
  2. Dismissed29 May 20266005451
    2 Looms Lane, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 1HE
  3. Allowed15 April 20266002651
    Depden Hall, The Green, Depden, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP29 4BY
  4. Allowed12 December 20253371739
    Beech Hedge Farm Weston Ditch, West Row, Bury St. Edmunds, IP28 8RE
  5. Allowed25 September 20253361490
    Land West of Saxham Business Park, Off Newmarket Road, Risby, IP28 6RX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.