Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20243345595

Land rear of 9 Terrace Road, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 8JA

erection of 2 no. 3 bedroom dwellings with integral garages, associated access, hard and soft landscaping, demolition of brick constructed wall

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gilbert J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Grade II listed Rocky Hill Terrace and the Rocky Hill Conservation Area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring and future occupiers, with regard to outlook, privacy and external amenity space

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the Grade II listed building and conservation area, combined with harm to neighbouring living conditions, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

the less than substantial harm to the listed building and conservation area was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposed development

Framework references: 212, 215, 131, 135, 139

Plan policies cited: LPRENV1, LPRHOU2, LPRSP14(B), LPRSP15, LPRQD7

Judgments cited: R.(oao James Hall and Company Limited) v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council and Co-Operative Group Limited [2019] EWHC 2899 (Admin); City & Country Bramshill Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and others [2021] EWCA Civ 320

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.