Planning appeal decision
166 Fleet Road, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 4BE
Planning appeal 3345743 at 166 Fleet Road, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 4BE (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 27 December 2024 by Inspector Normington S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area.
Erection of a four storey building following demolition of existing two storey building, with ground floor commercial unit and undercroft car parking and servicing area and 26 residential apartments at first, second and third floors (14 x 1 bedrooms, 12 x 2 bedrooms)
- Authority
- Hart District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Normington S
- Postcode
- GU51 4BE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of nearby residential properties with particular regard to privacy, outlook and daylight/sunlight
- The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety with particular regard to car parking provision
- The effect of the proposal on the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area
What decided it
The significant and unacceptable adverse impacts upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area, particularly along Branksomewood Road, and the severe harm to the living conditions of occupants of No. 164A Fleet Road and Branksome Chambers substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and brownfield redevelopment.
The benefits of housing supply, brownfield redevelopment and retail provision (afforded significant weight) were substantially outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance along Branksomewood Road (significant negative weight) and the severe harm to living conditions of neighbouring occupants through loss of outlook and privacy (substantial negative weight).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NBE9 of the Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032Policy ED5(d) of the Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032Policy ED5(c) of the Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032Saved Policy GEN1 of the Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) 1996–2006Policy 10 of the Fleet Neighbourhood Plan (2018–2032)Policy NBE3 of the Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032Policy INF3 of the Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032Saved Policy NRM6 of the South East Plan – Regional Spatial Strategy for the South EastPolicy 19 of the Fleet Neighbourhood Plan (2018–2032)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 111Paragraph 112Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hart
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed30 July 20263375985Park and Ride, Elvetham Heath Way, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 1HG
- Allowed13 February 20266002947Highbank, Copse Lane, Long Sutton, Hampshire, RG29 1SX
- Allowed27 January 20263372608Grey House Mount Pleasant, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PW
- Allowed18 December 202560006022 Chantreyland, New Road, Eversley, Hampshire, RG27 0PA
- Allowed18 December 202560006011 Chantreyland, New Road, Eversley, Hampshire, RG27 0PA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®