Planning appeal decision
Vacant Site at Red Post Hill (Rear of 19 Village Way), London, SE21 7AN
Planning appeal 3345997 at Vacant Site at Red Post Hill (Rear of 19 Village Way), London, SE21 7AN (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 11 October 2024 by Inspector Moss J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building, Lyndenhurst House, or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses.
the erection of a 1.8m high wall to the southern end of the site along the boundary with Lyndenhurst House
- Authority
- London Borough of Southwark
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Moss J
- Postcode
- SE21 7AN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building, Lyndenhurst House, or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Dulwich Village Conservation Area
- The effect of the development on protected trees
- The effect of the development on biodiversity
- Whether the proposal would be acceptable, having regard to relevant policies and guidance on fire safety
What decided it
The proposal would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building and the conservation area by physically severing the historic garden, and this harm was not outweighed by any clear and convincing public benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC1Policy P19Policy P20Policy P21Policy P56Policy P60Policy P61Policy G1Policy G5Policy SI4Policy SI13Policy D12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Southwark
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed20 October 20266010489269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
- Dismissed30 September 202660018595 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
- Dismissed29 September 20266003226Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
- Dismissed16 September 20266012237123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
- Dismissed17 August 20266007608134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®