Planning appeal decision
43A Barkers Lane, Wythall, Birmingham, Worcestershire, B47 6BY
Planning appeal 3346123 at 43A Barkers Lane, Wythall, Birmingham, Worcestershire, B47 6BY (Bromsgrove District Council) was dismissed on 4 February 2025 by Inspector Raygen Z, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Demolition of existing dwelling and caravan storage and kennels buildings; erection of 27 dwellings with associated road, landscaping, infrastructure and external works
- Authority
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Raygen Z
- Postcode
- B47 6BY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and whether the proposal would conflict with the purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on flooding
- whether the appeal site is an acceptable location with regard to local and national policy and accessibility
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- whether the proposal makes acceptable provision for infrastructure
- whether the proposal provides acceptable provision of affordable housing
- if the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The significant harms to character and appearance, unsustainable location, unresolved drainage concerns, and failure to provide affordable housing and infrastructure contributions substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery in the context of a shortfall in five-year supply.
The substantial weight given to housing delivery and use of previously developed land was substantially and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harms to character and appearance, conflict with spatial strategy, unsustainable location, unresolved drainage risk, and inadequate affordable housing and infrastructure provision.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BDP4.4Policy BDP1Policy BDP7Policy BDP19Policy BDP24Policy BDP23Policy 2Policy 16Policy 22Policy BDP6Policy BDP8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 129Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 139Paragraph 66
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bromsgrove District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 20266013818Stewards Place, Kidderminster Road, Woodcote Green, Dodford, Bromsgrove, B61 9DZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266010850The Bungalow, Hartle Lane, Bromsgrove, DY9 9UL
- Allowed10 September 20266011301Land at Doctors Hill, Bournheath, Bromsgrove, B61 9JE
- Allowed17 August 20266010859Giles House Farm, Bromsgrove Road, Stoubridge, DY9 9TY
- Dismissed7 August 20266008391Five Spice Restuarant, Stourbridge Road, Belbroughton, DY9 9TX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®