Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 February 20253346399

2C Seymour Place, London, SE25 4XU

Planning appeal 3346399 at 2C Seymour Place, London, SE25 4XU (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 12 February 2025 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on employment floorspace in the borough.

demolition of existing two-storey rear extension and erection of two- storey rear extension to provide a 3-bedroom dwelling and provision of associated amenity space and cycle and refuse storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M
Postcode
SE25 4XU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on employment floorspace in the borough
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to internal space, privacy and outlook
  • the effect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of 44 Apsley Road, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The proposal fails to accord with the development plan on multiple grounds—loss of employment floorspace without demonstrated lack of demand, harm to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, and minor harm to neighbours' outlook—and no material considerations outweigh these conflicts.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy E2London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D6Local Plan Policy SP3Local Plan Policy SP4Local Plan Policy SP2Local Plan Policy DM10

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

342 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Croydon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015751
    20 Newark Road, South Croydon, CR2 6HQ
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014574
    58 Kingswood Way, South Croydon, CR2 8QQ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266013110
    7 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266014301
    77-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266009641
    3 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.