Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 January 20253346466

Briarfield House, Stroud Road, Painswick, Gloucestershire, GL6 6RS

Planning appeal 3346466 at Briarfield House, Stroud Road, Painswick, Gloucestershire, GL6 6RS (Stroud District Council) was allowed on 16 January 2025 by Inspector Robinson N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan.

erection of 1no. self build dwelling, ancillary operations and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robinson N
Postcode
GL6 6RS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Cotswold Beechwoods SAC

What decided it

The site's close relationship to the existing settlement of Painswick, combined with the absence of harm from the development plan conflict and the provision of adequate mitigation for the SAC, outweighed the policy conflict with CP15.

The limited development plan conflict brought no harm and was outweighed by the material consideration of boosting housing supply in accordance with the Framework's objective to significantly boost the supply of homes.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP15Policy CP14Policy CP2Policy CP3Policy HC3Policy HC4Policy ES6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stroud

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed13 October 20266009483
    Land Northwest of Stonehouse, Grid Ref Easting: 379777. Grid Ref Northing: 207047, Stonehouse, Gl10 3WP
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266005652
    Agricultural Barn, Upton Hill, Upton St Leonards, GL4 8DF
  3. Dismissed5 May 20263376602
    Land Adjoining The Deyne, Littleworth, Amberley, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 5AL
  4. Dismissed26 March 20266002277
    Land at Verney Road, Verney Road, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, GL10 2QD
  5. Dismissed24 February 20266001647
    Land at 86 Woodmancote, Dursley, Gloucestershire, GL11 4AJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.