Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 September 20243346522

44 Rollesby Road, Chessington, KT9 2BZ

demolition of the garage and erection part single part double side and rear extensions with front porch

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and on the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposal would have a harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area by introducing a bulky, incongruous addition with a flat roof and inappropriate window format that conflicts with the coherent design and hipped roof characteristics of the terrace.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM10 (Design Requirements for New Developments (Including House Extensions)) of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012), Policy D4 (Delivering Good Design) of The London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.