Planning appeal decision
Caretakers Flat, Castle Court School Knoll Lane, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne, BH21 3RF
Planning appeal 3346583 at Caretakers Flat, Castle Court School Knoll Lane, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne, BH21 3RF (Dorset) was dismissed on 13 February 2025 by Inspector Kent R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Change of use of main building to residential (1 dwelling). Demolition of outbuildings and erect a dwelling and associated works to facilitate this
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Kent R
- Postcode
- BH21 3RF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the landscape with particular reference to the Corfe Mullen Area of Great Landscape Value
- Whether the proposed dwellings would be in an accessible location having regard to the strategy in the development plan for the distribution of new development
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt and the significant harm to the character and appearance of the Area of Great Landscape Value, which together are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, mean very special circumstances do not exist to justify inappropriate development.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt and its openness, combined with substantial weight to significant harm to the AGLV and moderate weight to poor accessibility and conflict with locational strategy, was not clearly outweighed by the combined weight of other considerations including the fallback position of the 2023 conversion permission, modest housing provision, and biodiversity benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy KS3Policy KS2Policy HE2Policy HE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266010776The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
- Dismissed2 October 2026601211555, Boundary Lane, St Leonards and St Ives, BH24 2SE
- Dismissed24 August 2026600736938 Brook Lane, Corfe Mullen, BH21 3RD
- Dismissed12 August 20266007277Shady Glades, Long Lane, Wimborne, BH21 7AQ
- Dismissed7 August 20266007075The Ferns, Poole Road, Jubilee Cross, Lytchett Matravers, BH16 6AF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®