Planning appeal decision
Land at Dilmore Lane, Fernhill Heath, WR3 7SY
Planning appeal 3346731 at Land at Dilmore Lane, Fernhill Heath, WR3 7SY (Wychavon District Council) was allowed on 25 November 2024 by Inspector Nicholls H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
residential development for up to 130 dwellings (Use Class C3), including vehicular access from Dilmore Lane, pedestrian and cycle links, public open space, car parking, drainage, landscaping and other associated infrastructure. All matters reserved except for access
- Authority
- Wychavon District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- WR3 7SY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to the Council's settlement strategy
- the effects of the proposal on the significance of the Grade II listed building, Tappenhill Farmhouse
What decided it
The tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, engaged because the Council could only demonstrate a 2.78 year housing land supply, meant the identified harms did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial benefits of the housing scheme.
The substantial weight given to delivery of c.130 dwellings (including affordable and self-build housing), together with moderate weight for economic benefits and limited weight for biodiversity net gain, outweighed the harm to character and appearance, conflict with the settlement strategy, loss of BMV land, and the less than substantial harm to the setting of Tappenhill Farmhouse.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 25Policy SWDP2Policy SWDP6Policy SWDP24Policy SWDP15Policy SWDP39Policy SWDP7Policy SWDP4Policy SWDP1NCNP Policy NCH1ANCNP Policy NCH1B
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 208Paragraph 226
- Judgments
- Basingstoke and Deane BC v SoSLUHC and Bewley [2024] EWHC 1916 (Admin); Tewkesbury BC v SoSHCLG [2021] EWHC 2782 (Admin); Phides Estates (Overseas Ltd) v SoSCLG and Others [2015] EWHC 827 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 September 20266009011The Geldings, Bouts Lane, Holberrow Green, Inkberrow, Redditch, B96 6JX
- Dismissed17 September 20266008404Pinfield House, Brown Heath Lane, Martin Hussingtree, Droitwich, WR9 7JF
- Dismissed10 September 20266009042The Old Rectory, Road From A4538 Pershore Lane To Bredicot Village, Bredicot, WR7 4QA
- Invalid3 August 20266006351Lincomb Farm, Lincomb Lane, Hertlebury, DY13 9RB
- Dismissed29 June 20266007756Land West of Cockshot Lane (Os 9802 5620), Dormston, Kington, WR7 4LD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®