Planning appeal decision
13 Acacia Grove, West Kirby, Wirral, CH48 4DD
Planning appeal 3346808 at 13 Acacia Grove, West Kirby, Wirral, CH48 4DD (Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 November 2024 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether prior approval is required and should be granted for the proposed extension, having regard to the amenity of neighbouring occupiers with regard to daylight, sunlight, outlook and privacy.
single storey rear extension
- Authority
- Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Smith J
- Postcode
- CH48 4DD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether prior approval is required and should be granted for the proposed extension, having regard to the amenity of neighbouring occupiers with regard to daylight, sunlight, outlook and privacy
What decided it
The extension's overall height, depth and proximity to the shared boundary would significantly harm the outlook, daylight and sunlight amenity of the neighbouring property No. 11 Acacia Grove.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wirral
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 September 20266010411Land to the South of Telegraph Road, Caldy, CH48 1NZ
- Dismissed10 September 202660133101 Bronington Avenue, Eastham, CH62 6DT
- Allowed10 September 202660130646 Pine Way, Heswall, CH60 6RP
- Dismissed10 September 20266012026297 Frankby Road, Frankby, CH48 1PE
- Dismissed7 August 202660111135A Westwood Road, Bidston, CH43 9RG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®