Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 January 20253346831

7 Graham Gardens, Surbiton, Kingston Upon Thames, KT6 6LT

Planning appeal 3346831 at 7 Graham Gardens, Surbiton, Kingston Upon Thames, KT6 6LT (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 17 January 2025 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

for the part demolition of existing dwelling, erection of 2 new dwellings and associated access, bins and cycle provision

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
KT6 6LT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties
  • protected species, specifically bats

What decided it

The significant and demonstrable harm to character and appearance, living conditions of neighbours, and the unresolved risk to protected species outweighed the significant weight given to housing delivery benefits in circumstances of housing land supply shortfall.

The significant benefits of housing delivery and the Council's housing shortfall were outweighed by the significant harms to character and appearance, living conditions of neighbouring residents, and the unresolved impact on protected species.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS8DM10DM11DM6LP Policy D3LP Policy G6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

330 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 October 20266014767
    13 Hawks Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3DS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266005462
    150 Ewell Road, Surbiton, KT6 6HE
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266014049
    69 Sheephouse Way, New Malden, KT3 5PF
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266009912
    Onslow House First Floor Flat, 1 Crummock Chase, Surbiton, KT6 4NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.