Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision18 October 20243346958

Hazeldene, Ascot Road, Holyport, Maidenhead, SL6 2HY

for the raising of secondary ridge and alterations to the existing three dormers

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellis G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and whether it would preserve or enhance the Holyport Conservation Area
  • on the basis that the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would result in disproportionate additions to the original building and would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant harm to the conservation area.

Framework references: 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy QP3, Policy HE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.