Planning appeal decision
Afonwen, Ightenhill Park Lane, Burnley, BB12 0RW
Planning appeal 3347402 at Afonwen, Ightenhill Park Lane, Burnley, BB12 0RW (Burnley Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 January 2025 by Inspector Caine M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
‘stage 1 permission in principle for the erection of a single self-build dwelling’
- Authority
- Burnley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Caine M
- Postcode
- BB12 0RW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- Whether the proposed development would provide a suitable site for housing having regard to the development strategy for the area
- Whether acceptable living conditions would be provided for the occupiers of Afonwen and future residents of the proposed development, with particular regard to privacy
- If the proposed development would be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness, conflicts with the development strategy for locating new residential development, and would result in unacceptable living conditions for future residents due to overlooking and privacy concerns, with no very special circumstances to justify the development.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt, combined with conflicts with the development plan regarding location and living conditions, was not outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply, self-build provision, economic activity during construction, and other considerations, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP7Policy SP4Policy SP5Policy HS4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Dartford BC v SSCLG [2017] EWCA Civ 141
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Burnley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed24 September 20266011037Marton House, 31 West Street, Padiham, BB12 8JD
- Dismissed8 September 20266006054393 Burnley Road, Cliviger, Burnley, B10 4SU
- Dismissed3 October 20253363564Land North of A6068, Padiham, BB12 8UE
- Allowed16 June 20253361525Oak Tree Cottage, Castle Clough, Hapton, Burnley, BB12 7LN
- Dismissed15 February 20243322814Lower Childers Green Farm Mill Hill Lane, Hapton, Burnley, BB11 5QX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®