Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20243347431

128-130 Frant Road, Thornton Heath, CR7 7JU

the demolition of the existing warehouse and the erection of new dwellings (Class C3) with associated amenity, cycle parking, refuse storage, landscaping and associated works

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hunter A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The loss of the employment/industrial use at the appeal site, with particular regard to its marketing
  • Whether sustainable transport measures, particularly obligations contained within the UU relating to i) a contribution towards sustainable transport, and ii) car-free housing, would be reasonable and necessary to make the development acceptable

What decided it

The appellant's marketing of the site for employment use was inadequate and substantially short of the required period, so the loss of employment land was not justified and conflicted with the development plan.

The modest collective benefits of housing delivery, economic activity, highway safety improvement and heritage setting enhancement did not outweigh the significant harm from the unjustified loss of employment land and the resulting conflict with the development plan and the Framework.

Framework references: 85, 87, 57, 209, 127, 124, 77, 226, 8

Plan policies cited: CLP Policy SP3.2, LP Policy E4, LP Policy E7, CLP Policy SP8, CLP Policy SP8.12, CLP Policy SP8.13, CLP Policy SP6, LP Policy T5, CLP Policy DM29, CLP Policy SP8.15, CLP Policy DM30, LP Policy T6, LP Policy HC2

Judgments cited: Case No. CO/1225/2022

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.