Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 January 20253347565

39 Berkeley Avenue, Reading, RG1 6JS

Planning appeal 3347565 at 39 Berkeley Avenue, Reading, RG1 6JS (Reading Borough Council) was dismissed on 15 January 2025 by Inspector Cahalane R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to the safe operation of the highway for all users, parking provision, and refuse storage.

Change of use of ground floor shop F.2 (former A.1) to takeaway (sui generis) and installation of an extraction chimney

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Cahalane R
Postcode
RG1 6JS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to the safe operation of the highway for all users, parking provision, and refuse storage
  • the effect on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether the location outside of Reading town centre is acceptable, with particular regard to the development plan and the Framework

What decided it

The proposal would significantly harm the safe operation of the highway for all users through insufficient parking provision and refuse storage, conflicting with Policies TR3 and TR5 of the development plan, and this unacceptable highway safety risk was not outweighed by the limited social benefits claimed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy TR3Policy TR5Policy CC8Policy RL2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 91Paragraph 95

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

160 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Reading Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266002956
    Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266002955
    Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
  3. Dismissed22 September 20266004809
    1029 Oxford Road, Tilehurst, RG31 6TL
  4. Dismissed4 September 20266002961
    Pavement O/S 5 The Triangle, Tilehurst, Reading, RG30 4RN
  5. Dismissed4 September 20266002960
    Pavement O/S 5 The Triangle, Tilehurst, Reading, RG30 4RN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.