Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 December 20243347711

31 Chapman Crescent, Harrow, HA3 0TG

conversion of the existing semi-detached property into two self-contained flats

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Han U

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location of the site is suitable for the proposed development
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for its future occupiers with regard to internal floorspace, floor to ceiling heights and external amenity space

What decided it

The appeal site is located in a PTAL 2 area, failing to meet Policy BH11's requirement that conversion of family-sized dwellings must be within a PTAL 3 or above area, and this locational unsuitability outweighs the modest benefits of additional housing supply.

Plan policies cited: Policy BH11, Policy BH4, Policy D6, Policy BH13, Policy DMP1, Policy D6 of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.