Planning appeal decision
163 School Lane, Haskayne, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 7JF
Planning appeal 3347788 at 163 School Lane, Haskayne, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 7JF (West Lancashire District Council) was dismissed on 28 February 2025 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the green belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
‘Erection of Granny Annexe’
- Authority
- West Lancashire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- McDonagh C
- Postcode
- L39 7JF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the green belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the setting of a listed building
- Whether any harm to the green belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development
What decided it
The substantial weight that must be given to harm to the Green Belt and the great weight that must be given to the conservation of the designated heritage asset together considerably outweigh the private benefits to the appellant, which do not amount to very special circumstances or clear public benefits.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the adjacent listed building, were not clearly outweighed by the private health benefits to the appellant and the shortfall in housing land supply, as the proposal would not add a dwelling to housing supply and the benefits were private rather than public.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GN1Policy EN4Policy GN3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Lancashire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 202660137566 Moss Lane, Bickerstaffe, L39 0EX
- Allowed5 October 20266010014Land at Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall, West Lancs, L39 8SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266007428Land Adjacent to Model Farm, Plex Lane, Halsall, Ormskirk, L39 7JY
- Dismissed15 September 202660121883 Broad Lane, Downholland, Ormskirk, L39 7HS
- Allowed14 September 20266007163Prince Williams Inn, Beacon Lane, Dalton, WN8 7RU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®