Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20253347801

Land rear of 50-56 Cudham Lane North, Sevennoaks, Cudham, TN14 7RA

erection of 4 detached houses with integral garages, additional parking and planting of a wildflower meadow

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect on the living conditions of occupiers of No 50 Cudham Lane in terms of noise and disturbance
  • whether adequate provision would be made in respect of biodiversity, nature conservation and protected species
  • if the proposal is found to be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the failure to meet the Golden Rules for major development on grey belt land, combined with inadequate biodiversity provision, are not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site restoration.

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness, inappropriate development status, small harm from disconnected layout, and inadequate biodiversity provision were not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply, economic benefits and site restoration, so very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 11, 143, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy 49, Policy 4, Policy 37, Policy 72, Policy 69, London Plan Policy G2, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D4, London Plan Policy G6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.