Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 March 20253347876

1 Glenwood Villas Fifield Lane, Frensham, FARNHAM, GU10 3AR

‘the installation of a 1.8m total height, 1.5m Close Boarded Fence on top of 0.3m Concrete Gravel Boards on the Fifield Lane side of the property boundary’

Authority
Waverley Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Goldberg V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The fence constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by definition harmful to it, and the other considerations advanced by the appellant do not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy RE2 of the Waverley Borough Local Plan Part One: Strategic Policies and Sites, Policy DM14 of the Waverley Borough Local Plan Part Two: Site Allocations and Development Management Policies, Policy TD1 of the Waverley Borough Local Plan Part One: Strategic Policies and Sites, Policy DM4 of the Waverley Borough Local Plan Part Two: Site Allocations and Development Management Policies, Policy FNP1 of the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan (2020)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.