®Planning appeal decision
Dismissed11 June 20253348035
67 Josephine Avenue, LONDON, SW2 2JZ
roof extension and internal modifications on the first-floor level
- Authority
- London Borough of Lambeth
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Goldberg V
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Rush Common Brixton Hill Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the significance of 95 Brixton Hill as a Grade II listed building, through development in its setting
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 91 and 93 Brixton Hill in respect of outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance and daylight/sunlight
What decided it
The proposed development would fail to preserve or enhance the conservation area's character, harm the setting of the listed building, and unacceptably impact neighbouring occupants' outlook and privacy, with these harms outweighing any limited public benefits.
Framework references: 205, 208
Plan policies cited: Policy Q5, Policy Q8, Policy Q11, Policy Q22, Policy Q20, Policy Q2
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.