Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld16 January 20263348046

Flat 2, Regency Lodge Adelaide Road, London, NW3 5EE

Planning appeal 3348046 at Flat 2, Regency Lodge Adelaide Road, London, NW3 5EE (London Borough of Camden) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 16 January 2026 by Inspector Boffin D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the removal of the original steel/'Crittall' windows and replacement with UPVC windows in flats 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 21, 100 and 101 preserves the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and whether the significance of the heritage asset is harmed.

Without Listed Building Consent, the removal of the original steel/Crittal windows and replacement with UPVC windows

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
enforcement · Appeal against Enforcement Listed Building Notice/Enforcement Conservation Area Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Boffin D
Postcode
NW3 5EE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the removal of the original steel/'Crittall' windows and replacement with UPVC windows in flats 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 21, 100 and 101 preserves the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and whether the significance of the heritage asset is harmed

What decided it

The public benefits relied on by the appellant were not sufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building caused by the UPVC replacement windows, and alternative means of achieving those benefits without the harm had not been shown to be unavailable.

the less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance was not outweighed by the public benefits of the works (energy efficiency, living conditions, appearance, long-term conservation), so the balance tipped against granting listed building consent

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1 (Design)Policy D2 (Heritage)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 215Paragraph 213Paragraph 167

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

731 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice upheld17 September 20263376816
    Flat 1, Mexborough, Pratt Street, London, NW1 0BL
  2. Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263372650
    107 West End Lane, London, NW6 4SY
  3. Notice upheld17 September 20263361256
    3 Collard Place, Lonon, NW1 8DU
  4. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263356264
    Flat A, 190 Fordwych Road, London, NW2 3NX
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds15 September 20263378458
    12 Argyle Street, London, WC1H 8EG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.