Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 January 20253348534

1A South Walk, Bromley, BR4 9JA

Planning appeal 3348534 at 1A South Walk, Bromley, BR4 9JA (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 10 January 2025 by Inspector Murray D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the scale and nature of the use would provide a high standard of amenity for the future occupiers.

a change of use from residential (class C3) to 6-person HMO (class C4)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Murray D
Postcode
BR4 9JA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the scale and nature of the use would provide a high standard of amenity for the future occupiers
  • The effect on the character of the area
  • The effect on living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties

What decided it

The poor residential environment for some occupiers resulting from severely constrained outlook and natural light in three bedrooms significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of additional housing supply.

The poor residential environment for occupiers was balanced against the addition of new residential units during a period of insufficient housing supply, but the permanent adverse impact outweighed the housing benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Local Plan Policy 9Local Plan Policy 4Local Plan Policy 37London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

188 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bromley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld28 July 20263353877
    Crystal Palace Football Club Youth Academy, Beckenham, London, BR3 1NZ
  2. Split Decision10 July 20263346767
    27 Victoria Gardens, Biggin Hill, Westerham, TN16 3DJ
  3. Planning permission granted17 June 20263351724
    Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd, 30 Station Road, Orpington, BR6 0SA
  4. Allowed28 May 20266007385
    223 Crofton Lane, Petts Wood, Orpington, Kent, BR6 0BL
  5. Dismissed26 May 20266002064
    Eden Park High School, Balmoral Avenue, Beckenham, London Borough of Bromley, BR3 3RD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.