Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 September 20243348842

30 Minchenden Crescent, Southgate, Enfield, N14 7EL

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Deane G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and the local area

What decided it

The scale and design of the first floor rear and front extensions, taken together with other elements, cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the host building and local area, conflicting with development plan policies promoting high quality design appropriate to local character.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 of The London Plan, Core Policy 4 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Core Policy 30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy DMD 6 of the Development Management Document, Policy DMD 8 of the Development Management Document, Policy DMD 11 of the Development Management Document, Policy DMD 13 of the Development Management Document, Policy DMD 14 of the Development Management Document, Policy DMD 37 of the Development Management Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.