Planning appeal decision
Land Adj. Alwyn, Green Lane, Shipley Bridge, RH6 9TJ
Planning appeal 3349392 at Land Adj. Alwyn, Green Lane, Shipley Bridge, RH6 9TJ (Tandridge District Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 25 July 2025 by Inspector King T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The need and provision of gypsy and traveller sites within the Medway area.
Use of the land and buildings as a residential caravan site, including the laying of hardcore
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- King T
- Postcode
- RH6 9TJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The need and provision of gypsy and traveller sites within the Medway area
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, both in terms of its location and also it being within a locally designated Biodiversity Opportunity Area
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable gypsy and traveller pitches, combined with the personal circumstances of the occupiers, outweighed the harm caused, justifying a temporary and personal permission rather than dismissal.
The lack of a five-year supply of deliverable gypsy and traveller pitches and the personal circumstances of the occupiers outweighed the harm to character, appearance and biodiversity and the weight attached to the intentional unauthorised development, but only sufficiently to justify a temporary, personal permission of four years rather than a permanent one.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CSP 9CSP 17DP19DP7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 155Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1 KB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR [2000] JPL 1025
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Quashed On Legal Grounds28 August 20263378115Land at Whyteleafe House, 439-445 Godstone Road, Whyteleafe, CR3 0BL
- Dismissed28 July 20266006830Beech Farm Road, Warlingham, CR6 9QJ
- Allowed13 July 20266002345Land Adjacent to Heathview, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6LG
- Dismissed28 May 20263358927Land Adjacent to 2 Carewell Cottages , St Piers Lane, Lingfield, Surrey, RH7 6PN
- Invalid23 March 20263368581Land to the South of Woodlands, Weatherhill Common, Smallfield, Horley, RH6 9JF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®