Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 January 20253349510

107 Brondesbury Road, Brent, London, NW6 6RY

Planning appeal 3349510 at 107 Brondesbury Road, Brent, London, NW6 6RY (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 23 January 2025 by Inspector Conde L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Kilburn Conservation Area.

creation of a vehicular crossover including a dropped kerb, alterations to the front boundary wall, installation of electric vehicle charging point, creation of bin storage and associated hard and soft landscaping to provide one off street car parking space for the property

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Conde L
Postcode
NW6 6RY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Kilburn Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would discourage sustainable travel
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to the character and appearance of the Kilburn Conservation Area through partial removal of the front boundary wall, which would disrupt the rhythm and continuity of boundary enclosures that are a positive feature of the conservation area, and this harm could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BHC1Policy BT2Policy BT4London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 766 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  3. Notice varied and upheld14 August 20263364758
    Flats 1-3, 11 Blenheim Gardens, London, NW2 4NL
  4. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263343790
    10 Stewart Close, London, NW9 8AJ
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.