Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 January 20253349810

62 St. Vincent Crescent, Horndean, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9JD

described on the application form as, “Construction of single storey front extension to include the repositioning of the front entrance, 2 No. dormers to front roof slope, rear dormer, gable build up and installation of rooflight to existing rear extension (re -submission of 60244)”

Authority
East Hampshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property

What decided it

The proposed rear dormer's excessive scale and massing would create an unacceptable and harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host property, conflicting with the development plan and NPPF.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy CP29, Policy HE2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.