Planning appeal decision
Long Close Retirement Rest Home, 23 Forest Road, Bournemouth, Christchurch, Poole , BH13 6DQ
Planning appeal 3350004 at Long Close Retirement Rest Home, 23 Forest Road, Bournemouth, Christchurch, Poole , BH13 6DQ (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 14 May 2025 by Inspector Cuthbert L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on the significance of the designated heritage asset of Chester Road Conservation Area, by virtue of development within its setting.
Demolition of existing block of care home units and construction of replacement block of care home units
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Cuthbert L
- Postcode
- BH13 6DQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on the significance of the designated heritage asset of Chester Road Conservation Area, by virtue of development within its setting
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the existing occupants of 1 and 2 The Rydal, and 1 The Grove, with regard to outlook and privacy
- whether the proposal provides satisfactory living conditions for future occupants of the care home, in regard to external amenity space and outlook
- the effect of the proposed development on protected species, most notably bats
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with specific regard to parking provision
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Chester Road Conservation Area through development within its setting was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, and paragraph 215 of the Framework balance was not satisfactorily achieved.
The less than substantial harm to the heritage asset was weighed against public benefits including 15 additional care home bed spaces (contributing 8 housing units), meeting identified care home need, economic benefits from construction and job creation, and environmental benefits from sustainable location; however, the public benefits did not outweigh the heritage harm, and paragraph 215 balance was not achieved.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PP27Policy PP28Policy PP30Policy PP33Policy PP35
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 208Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 September 2026600783665a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
- Allowed28 September 20266007175281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
- Allowed24 September 202660071875 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
- Allowed4 September 2026601111118 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH
- Allowed4 September 20266003539Marina Court, 34 Banks Road, Poole, BH13 7QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®