Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 December 20243350412

54 Fox Lane, Southgate, Middlesex, N13 4AL

described on the application form thus: “Front elevation To replace the existing timber windows and doors with Double glazed, energy efficient timber windows and doors. To match as close as possible the existing frames. The rear elevation to replace with Upvc Timber replica windows and door to match the existing as close as possible

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dale A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed replacement timber front windows and front door on the character and appearance of the Lakes Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The poor condition of the existing windows, combined with the appellant's careful replication of the original design in traditional materials and proportions, means the proposed replacement would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area despite minor technical differences in glazing bar detailing.

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 30, Core Policy 31, Policy DMD 37, Policy DMD 44, London Plan Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.