Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds26 August 20253350847

Flint Acre, Toddington Lane, Littlehampton , West Sussex, BN17 7PN

without planning permission and within the last ten (10) years the: a) Material change of use of the land to a mixture of general storage yard, storage of lorries and other vehicles, caravan siting and habitation and scaffolding company operation. b) Operational development by the creation of hardstanding. c) Operational development by the placement of shipping containers and portable offices. d) Other operational development in terms of associated lighting, cess pit(s), erection of scaffolding, erection of parameter fencing exceeding 2m in height and any other associated development

Authority
Arun District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Phillips A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the enforcement notice specifies with sufficient clarity the alleged breach of planning control and the steps required for compliance

What decided it

The enforcement notice failed to specify with sufficient clarity the alleged breach of planning control and the steps required for compliance, containing ambiguous and uncertain language that could not be fully corrected without causing injustice to the appellants or local planning authority.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.