Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 February 20253351297

17 Wharfdale Road, London, N1 9SB

Planning appeal 3351297 at 17 Wharfdale Road, London, N1 9SB (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 18 February 2025 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character of the Keystone Crescent Conservation Area in which the site is located.

Demolition of 1.5 storey rear WC block replaced by 2.5 storey WC/shower block, glazed rear garden extension at basement level, partial basement excavation with underpinning to increase floor-to-ceiling heights, mansard roof conversion to create additional third floor room with photovoltaics and raised chimneys, exterior refurbishment including timber sash windows and insulation, full interior refurbishment converting three flats to single family residence

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
N1 9SB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character of the Keystone Crescent Conservation Area in which the site is located

What decided it

The proposed mansard roof extension and rear extension would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area by disrupting the consistent roofline and uniform appearance of the traditional terrace, and the limited public benefits do not outweigh this less than substantial harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
PLAN1DH1DH2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 125Paragraph 210Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 829 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.