Planning appeal decision
Land At Lyde Green, Emersons Green, BS16 7NT
Planning appeal 3351774 at Land At Lyde Green, Emersons Green, BS16 7NT (South Gloucestershire Council) was allowed on 24 April 2025 by Inspector Hall R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether condition 2 is reasonable, necessary and enforceable, having regard to the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area.
Construction of a 7m access road into the Lyde Green development site with associated changes in priority of Lyde Green Road; widening of Lyde Green Road north to Road 5 to 7m and installation of a 3m multi-user path with street lighting and planting; re-surfacing of existing public right of way, without complying with conditions 2 and 11 attached to planning permission Ref P19/16524/F
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- other · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Hall R
- Postcode
- BS16 7NT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether condition 2 is reasonable, necessary and enforceable, having regard to the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area
- whether condition 11 is necessary, having regard to the provisions of the 2006 Act
What decided it
Condition 2 was retained in modified form because delivering the access road in advance of the residential development it served would cause modest but real harm to rural character, while condition 11 was found unnecessary because the Commons Act 2006 already provided statutory protection for the common land independent of the planning condition.
The modest, temporary harm to rural character from the access road being built ahead of the residential development it was intended to serve, combined with the highly limited standalone benefits of the works, justified retaining an amended (rather than removed) pre-commencement restriction under condition 2; separately, the lack of necessity for condition 11 outweighed any residual role it played in protecting common land, given existing statutory protections.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS8Policy CS29Policy CS9Policy PSP1Policy PSP2Policy PSP3Policy PSP10Policy PSP11Policy PSP19Policy PSP44Policy PSP47
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 104Paragraph 99
- Judgments
- Newbury DC v SSE [1978] 1 WLR 1211
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 2026601230261 Durban Road, Bristol, BS34 5HG
- Allowed16 October 20266014921Land At 39 Bude Road, Filton, BS34 7HW
- Dismissed13 October 2026601187149 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
- Dismissed13 October 20266010963Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
- Dismissed13 October 20266009931Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®