Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 April 20253351989

Hill Bury Halls Lane, Waltham St. Lawrence, Reading, RG10 0JD

a “Relocation of front entrance door with canopy, single storey side extension, replacement roof, raising of the ridge, 1no. front dormer, 1no. side dormer, 3no. rear dormers, alterations to fenestration and external finish, air source heat pumps, extension of the existing patio, hardstanding, following demolition of existing elements

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manley N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policies, and the effect it would have on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause harm to openness, and the appellants have failed to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 142, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.