Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20253352358

7 Guildford Road, London, E17 4EA

Planning appeal 3352358 at 7 Guildford Road, London, E17 4EA (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 June 2025 by Inspector Livingstone C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the application is accompanied by plans which are drawn to an identified scale and show the existing and proposed elevations and the position and dimensions of proposed windows, and whether there is sufficient information to establish compliance with the conditions, limitations and restrictions specified in paragraphs AA.1 and AA.2 of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO 2015.

construction of a single storey ground floor rear extension. Rear extension shall only extend by 3m beyond the current existing extension. Total length of new and extension is 6m beyond the original wall of the property. The new extension shall be a flat roof height of 3m and eaves height of 2.85m. No work shall be done on the loft level, first floor level or front elevation of the property. Rear elevation shall be the same as the current existing rear extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Livingstone C
Postcode
E17 4EA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the application is accompanied by plans which are drawn to an identified scale and show the existing and proposed elevations and the position and dimensions of proposed windows, and whether there is sufficient information to establish compliance with the conditions, limitations and restrictions specified in paragraphs AA.1 and AA.2 of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO 2015

What decided it

The inaccuracy and insufficiency of the submitted plans meant there was insufficient information to establish compliance with the statutory requirements for prior approval under the GPDO 2015.

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

330 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.