Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 May 20253352407

11 Forrest Gardens, London, SW16 4LP

Planning appeal 3352407 at 11 Forrest Gardens, London, SW16 4LP (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 29 May 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the condition is reasonable or necessary to protect trees and in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of adjacent occupiers.

erection of upward extension, two storey side and rear extensions and conversion of garage. Alterations to roof with erection of rear and side dormers and installation of rooflights. Alterations of fenestrations. Hard landscaping and car parking provision in the front garden providing two off street parking spaces without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 23/02848/HSE, dated 24th April 2024

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Goldberg V
Postcode
SW16 4LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the condition is reasonable or necessary to protect trees and in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of adjacent occupiers

What decided it

The condition is reasonable and necessary as it prevents further extensions that would result in disproportionate additions dominating the original dwelling and failing to respect the modest form and scale of dwellings in the area, whilst protecting trees and local character.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London PlanPolicy SP4 of the Croydon Local PlanPolicy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

392 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Croydon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015751
    20 Newark Road, South Croydon, CR2 6HQ
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014574
    58 Kingswood Way, South Croydon, CR2 8QQ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266013110
    7 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266014301
    77-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266009641
    3 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.