Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld6 August 20253352546

223-225 Ilderton Road, London, SE15 1NS

Planning appeal 3352546 at 223-225 Ilderton Road, London, SE15 1NS (London Borough of Southwark) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 August 2025 by Inspector Bale M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the area.

Without planning permission, the erection of a second storey extension, the creation of new window openings and installation of uPVC windows and the rendering of the exterior of the building (“the Unauthorised Development”)

Authority
London Borough of Southwark
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bale M
Postcode
SE15 1NS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on fire safety
  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control
  • Whether the period specified to comply with the requirements of the notice is reasonable

What decided it

The development carried out does not respect the host building or terrace, appearing as a disjointed collection of poorly positioned windows and doors on a bland elevation, causing material harm to character and appearance that cannot be justified by material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan 2021 Policy D4London Plan 2021 Policy HC1London Plan 2021 Policy D12Southwark Plan 2022 Policy P13Southwark Plan 2022 Policy P14Southwark Plan 2022 Policy P21

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

391 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld7 April 20263361416
    12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
  2. Dismissed7 April 20263344253
    Flat 1, 12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
  3. Notice varied and upheld5 February 20263364196
    211 Walworth Road, London, SE17 1RL
  4. Notice varied and upheld7 January 20263354856
    96 Goodrich Road, London, SE22 0ER
  5. Notice upheld7 January 20263337227
    32 Meeting House Lane, London, SE15 2UN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.