Planning appeal decision
Sunny Bank Farm, Stoney Lane, Alvechurch, Worcestershire, B48 7DG
Planning appeal 3352558 at Sunny Bank Farm, Stoney Lane, Alvechurch, Worcestershire, B48 7DG (Bromsgrove District Council) was dismissed on 9 April 2025 by Inspector Bromley N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is in a suitable location having regard to local and national policies and access to services and facilities.
Construction of 2 dwellings and demolition of existing barn approved for residential conversion (approved under application ref. 23/01098/CUPRIO)
- Authority
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bromley N
- Postcode
- B48 7DG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is in a suitable location having regard to local and national policies and access to services and facilities
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the non-designated heritage asset
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduction in openness, combined with unacceptable harm to the non-designated heritage asset, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and the Green Belt protection policies in the Framework provided a clear reason for refusal notwithstanding the lack of five-year housing supply.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt (inappropriateness and loss of openness) and significant harm to the non-designated heritage asset were not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply contribution and the fallback position, such that very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BDP1Policy BDP2Policy BDP4Policy BDP19Policy BDP20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bromsgrove District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 20266013818Stewards Place, Kidderminster Road, Woodcote Green, Dodford, Bromsgrove, B61 9DZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266010850The Bungalow, Hartle Lane, Bromsgrove, DY9 9UL
- Allowed10 September 20266011301Land at Doctors Hill, Bournheath, Bromsgrove, B61 9JE
- Allowed17 August 20266010859Giles House Farm, Bromsgrove Road, Stoubridge, DY9 9TY
- Dismissed7 August 20266008391Five Spice Restuarant, Stourbridge Road, Belbroughton, DY9 9TX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®