Planning appeal decision
Four Seasons, Ferry Road, Bray, Maidenhead, Windsor and Maidenhead, SL6 2AT
Planning appeal 3352745 at Four Seasons, Ferry Road, Bray, Maidenhead, Windsor and Maidenhead, SL6 2AT (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was allowed on 18 August 2025 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
erection of x1 new detached dwelling with x1 new detached garage and associated landscaping following demolition of existing dwelling and associated outbuildings
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Philpott M
- Postcode
- SL6 2AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the Bray Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on trees
- whether the proposal would incorporate satisfactory measures to adapt to and mitigate climate change
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The fallback position of permitted development comprising larger, more sprawling outbuildings would be more harmful to Green Belt openness and the Conservation Area than the proposed replacement dwelling, constituting a material consideration of considerable weight that clearly outweighs the harm from inappropriateness.
The harm by reason of inappropriateness and significant spatial harm to Green Belt openness, attracting substantial weight, was clearly outweighed by the fallback position being more harmful, modest construction employment benefits, biodiversity net gain and wildlife enhancements, and energy efficiency measures, such that very special circumstances exist to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy QP3Policy HE1Policy NR3Policy SP2Policy NR2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
- Dismissed29 July 20266007938Challen's Chicks, Land Adjacent to Honey House, Land West of Winter Hill Road, Bisham, SL6 6PJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®