Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld13 May 20263352771

44 Amesbury Avenue, London, SW2 3AA

Without planning permission, the removal of the original wooden front door and frame from the premises and replacement with a UPVC front door and frame (“the unauthorised uPVC front door and frame”)

Authority
London Borough of Lambeth
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Lo S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Leigham Court Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The replacement door and frame fails to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and conflicts with the statutory duty under section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and relevant development plan policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy Q2, Policy Q5, Policy Q8, Policy Q11, Policy Q22, Policy D4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.